5th Grade Rain Garden Design Challenge Handouts


Rain garden, photo credit Aaron Volkenig 

Rain Garden Location & Design Challenge!

Group Members:  ___________________________________________________________________________________

Using field investigation data and what you have learned from the in-class “Get Ready to Engineer: Rainwater Runoff Design Challenge,” your team will measure and use the data below to propose a site for a rain garden on school forest property.

Step 1: Identify areas of runoff/erosion

From the designated starting location, conduct a survey of the school forest property within the boundaries indicated on your school forest property map by your instructor. Draw a circle on your map indicating any areas that show three or more indications of erosion and/or runoff within the designated area. Use the checklist below to guide you in circling areas showing high evidence of erosion and/or runoff:

Signs of erosion:                                                           Signs of runoff:   

☐ Tree roots, small stones, or rocks exposed                 ☐ Flowing water on soil surface (after a rain)           

☐ Gullies (wash-out ditches) visible                              ☐ Water collecting on soil surface (after a rain)          

☐ Steam channels on land                                              ☐ Sediment collecting on low areas or pavement    

☐ Wood chips or other trail covering moved by flowing water                 

Step 2: Identify potential rain garden locations-Slope

With your team, choose 2-3 potential rain garden locations based on evidence of erosion and runoff criteria above. Follow the instructions and diagram below to fill in Table 1. Number each site in the table and indicate measurements and slope calculation. If the slope is greater than 12%, the site is not suitable for a rain garden.

Slope Measurement

Slope measurement diagram and instructions, photo credit: UW-Extension Environmental Resources Center, 2003

Table 1: Slope Measurements of Potential Rain Garden Site Locations

Potential Rain Garden Site #Distance (cm)Height (cm)% Slope (Height x 100)                  DistanceGreater than 12%? (Y/N)
1
2
3

Step 3: Identify potential rain garden locations-Soil Type

Select the potential rain garden sites from Table 1 that fit the slope criteria (<12% slope). Next you will determine suitability based on soil type. Follow the directions below and record data in Table 2.

  1. Use a soil corer or hand trowel and a measuring tape or meter stick to dig 12-15 cm below the surface of the soil.
  2. Collect 3 soil samples of 2 tsp each from 12-15 cm depth and place in the palm of your hand.
  3. Add drops of water from your squeeze bottle until the soil is moldable, like putty.
  4. Knead the soil until it forms a ball. If it does not stay in a ball, record this in Table 2.
  5. If the soil forms a ball, use your thumb and pointer finger to roll the ball into a ribbon of soil of the same thickness and width. Keep rolling the ribbon until it breaks under its own weight. Record the data for when the ribbon breaks in Table 2. If the soil ribbon is greater than 5 cm before it breaks, it is not suitable for a rain garden.

Table 2: Soil Types of Potential Rain Garden Site Locations

Potential Rain Garden Site #Soil forms a ball? (Y/N) N=SandySoil ribbon breaks at<2.5 cm (Y/N)Y = Silty  Soil ribbon breaks between 2.5-5 cm (Y/N)Y = ClayeySoil ribbon breaks at > 5 cm (Y/N)Y = not suitableSoil Type (Sandy, Silty, Clayey)
11
2
3
21
2
3
31
2
3


Phosphate Color Scale, photo credit: Get Ready to Engineer Rain Garden, hand2mind.com

Non-point Source Pollution:  Phosphate

Group Members:  ____________________________________________________________________________

Using field investigation data and what you have learned from the in-class “Get Ready to Engineer: Rainwater Runoff Design Challenge,” your team will measure the amount of phosphate in waterways at the school forest property. For both waterways, follow the procedure below and record data in Table 3.

Step 4: Measure phosphate levels in waterways:

For each waterway, follow the procedure below to measure the amount of phosphate. Measure and test three water samples at each site and calculate the average of the three samples.

  1. Measure 5 mL of sample water into three 10 mL graduated cylinders with caps. (If using test tubes with stoppers, measure 5 mL of sample water into 3 test tubes.)
  2. Add 1 phosphate TesTab into each graduated cylinder or test tube.
  3. Cap the sample container and shake until the TesTab is completely dissolved.
  4. Using the stopwatch, measure 5 minutes of time.
  5. Compare the graduated cylinder or test tube to the Freshwater Phosphate Color Card to determine the ppm of phosphate in each water sample. Record in Table 3 below.
  6. Use a calculator to determine the average ppm phosphate in each waterway.  

Table 3: Phosphate Levels in Field Study Site Waterways

WaterwaySample #1Sample #2Sample #3Average (ppm)  
Pond
Creek


Rain garden, photo credit Aaron Volkenig

Rain Garden Design Challenge Criteria

Using field investigation data and what you have learned from the in-class “Get Ready to Engineer: Rainwater Runoff Design Challenge,” your team must a proposal for the location and design of your rain garden.                                                                                         

  • The location proposal will be in the form of a CER and must meet the Location (Siting) criteria listed below.
  • A map of the landscape, showing the proposed rain garden location and the direction of water flow, must be included.
  • The design proposal will be in the form of a 2-dimensional rain garden model on graph paper that meets the Size, Shape, and Functionality criteria below.

Both the CER and rain garden model will be presented in a poster presentation format. Your proposal will be evaluated by other student groups (and you will evaluate other student group’s proposals). You will have the opportunity to revise your proposal based on student suggestions before your final instructor evaluation.

Location (Siting) criteria:

  • Slope 12% or less
  • Not over any septic system
  • Not in any area that “ponds” regularly (stays wet after a rain)
  • At least 10 ft (3 m) from any built structure
  • Not directly under any large tree
  • Not on any existing trail

Size and Shape criteria:

  • 100-300 sq. ft. (9-28 m2)
  • 3-8 in. deep (8-20 cm)
  • At least twice as long as wide
  • Length of rain garden perpendicular to landscape slope
  • Crescent, kidney, or teardrop shape


Rain garden, photo credit tOrange.biz

Functionality criteria:

  • Depth compensates for slope (see Table  4)
  • Size factor compensates for soil type (see Table 5)
  • Rain garden utilizes prior “Reflect On It” results from in-class investigations

Table 4 (Reference): Rain Garden Depth vs. Slope

SlopeMinimum Rain Garden Depth (cm)Maximum Rain Garden Depth (cm)
< 4%813
5-7%1618
8-12%2020
> 12%Rain garden not recommended

Table 5 (Reference): Rain Garden Size Factor Based on Soil Type

Rain Garden Depth (cm)
Soil Type7-1212-20
Sandy0.20.12
Silty0.340.20
Clayey0.430.28
OtherRain garden not recommended
Rain Garden Design Assessment Rubric
Design Criteria3-Unsatisfactory 6-Proficient10-AdvancedScore & Comments
Required Elements
  • Design not on graph paper or design incomplete
  • Design criteria not referenced
  • Design on graph paper and mostly complete
  • Some design criteria is referenced
  • Complete and high quality design on graph paper
  • All design criteria is referenced
Size
  • Rain garden exceeds maximum or minimum size
  • Rain garden exceeds maximum or minimum depth
  • Rain garden is within size limits
  • Rain garden is within depth limits
  • Rain garden is within size limits
  • Rain garden is within depth limits
  • Rain garden is twice as long as wide
Shape
  • Rain garden has square or rectangular shape
  • Rain garden is not perpendicular to slope of landscape
  • Rain garden has curved shape
  • Rain garden is perpendicular to slope of landscape
  • Rain garden has crescent, kidney, or teardrop shape
  • Shape and orientation of garden is aligned with runoff water flow
  • Rain garden is perpendicular to slope of landscape
Functionality
  • Depth calculations do not reflect landscape slope
  • Size calculations not adjusted for soil type
  • “Reflect on it” conclusions not referenced
  • Depth or size calculations adjusted for slope and soil type, but not both
  • “Reflect on it” conclusions somewhat referenced
  • Depth and size calculations adjusted for slope and soil type
  • “Reflect on it” conclusions accurately and appropriately  referenced
                                                                                              


                                                                                                  CER Organizer

  

                 CLAIM

  • A one sentence answer to your essential question

  • The claim needs to be supported by your evidence

 

                 EVIDENCE

  • Collect BOTH quantitative (number) and qualitative (descriptive) data

  • Record in a chart or data table

  • Display map of study area showing location, orientation and size of rain garden


      REASONING

  • Your explanation of how the evidence supports the claim.

  • Justifies why the evidence is appropriate and sufficient to the claim

 


CLAIM: A one sentence answer to your essential question: What is the best location and design for a rain garden at the school forest?




 








EVIDENCE: Include quantitative (number) and qualitative (descriptive) data:                                                                                                                                             REASONING/JUSTIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: Explain how the evidence supports the claim.


                                                            





CER Scoring Rubric:


Claim (2 pts)

Evidence (4 pts)

Reasoning (4 pts)

0

Does not state a claim, does not answer the essential question or is incomplete

Does not provide evidence

Does not provide reasoning statements

2

Makes an accurate and complete claim that answers the research question.

Evidence is inappropriate or incomplete evidence

Reasoning statements do not explain how the evidence supports the claim. Design criteria are not referenced. Guidelines are not followed.  

4


Provides appropriate (quantitative, qualitative or both)  and complete (all evidence is used) evidence.

Reasoning statements explain how the evidence supports the claim. Design criteria are referenced and guidelines are followed.  


                                                                                                                                                              Total:  ______/10

                                                                 Poster Evaluation Questioning/Feedback Prompts:

Peer Feedback Guidelines, photo credit: Debbie and Mel @TeacherTweaks


  1. What data or evidence was most significant in helping to determine the best location for the rain garden?
  2. How does your rain garden design take into account the slope and soil type of the landscape?
  3. How were your “Reflect On It” results incorporated into your design?
  4. What challenges did you encounter in developing your proposal?
  5. How well did your team members work together? What were your strengths/weaknesses?
Praise!Suggestion for Improvement







                                               


Return to top